knowt logo

Philosophy: Epistemology

Epistemology

  • study on knowledge; ideals with the nature of human world/consciousness -> gain knowledge about the truth

  • 3 Questions

    • What is knowledge/wisdom/certainty? [facts, reality, opinions, and knowledge]

    • What is the nature of knowledge? [criteria, defining points of knowledge]

    • How can one know reality? [how a human mind logically gain/understand reality]

  • 3 Philosophical Systems of Epistemology: rationalism, empiricism, critical philosophy

Rationalism

  • human intelligence is universal in all human minds

    • Regardless of differences

    • Optimistic

  • Human reason is a defining element of a human person

  • Human reason is the only means to certainty in knowledge

    • Human reason is not unruly

    • Logical way of thinking

  • Reason is the only way to determine what is morally right and good and what constitutes a good society

    • Reason is the gateway to reality

    • Makes us distinguish good from bad — can promote just and orderly society

Rene Descartes

  • supports reason as the only viable reason for the truth about life

  • Paris, France (1596-1650)

  • Elite society Father of Modern Philosophy

Modern Philosophy

  • based on the spectrum of science

  • Empowers the existence of men; prove God through human reason

  • Europe (17th-19th century) -> origin [France and Germany]

  • Epistemology and Metaphysics -> center

  • Direct reason to the “Medieval Period” (theocentric)

    • Medieval Period: man is finite-> cannot gain access to the truth; everyone glorified God as absolute truth; God-centered

  • Descartes wants to restore faith in humanity (make humans progress)

  • Rise of science -> step by step discipline

  • Galileo exterminated from Christian society: “Can the physical world be understood mathematically without reference to God?”

Rene Descartes (cont’d)

  • studied at “La Fleche” University (Jesuit order)

  • One of the founders of Analytic Geometry

  • Mathematics (i.e. Geometry)

    • Intuition and Deduction

    • Clear and Distinct

Theology is wrong

  • based on faith which is blind

  • Glorifies fiction instead of facts

  • Serves as blockage/limitation to human reasoning

    • Prevents men about learning new things in life

Intuition

  • ability of the mind/human reason to arrive at something that is really true/certain

  • Mind cannot help but accept it as true

Deduction

  • the capacity of the mind that complements intuition

  • To arrange certain truths in a logical sequence/hierarchy/ chronological

    • Comprehensive wisdom about life

    • 1–2–3

  • Mathematics is clear and distinct->test for the truth

    • Which is inevitably true

DESCARTES’ EPISTEMOLOGY: The Meditation

  • Main Objective: Total demolition and Reconstruction of human knowledge

FOUNDATIONAL PRINCIPLE: starting point/basis for certainty

  • clear and distinct -> free of error

  • Independent

    • Autonomous; not dependent on anything; free from other truths to be certain

      • The principle is a certain thing whose existence does not (...)

  • Existence

    • About something which is real/reality

Epistemology

  • rework knowledge of the past [inadequate]

  • Restructure based on own foundations and principles

  • System-builders

  • Mind-based

Best Philosophy - rigidly structured/uniformed at arriving at the truth

  • Philosophy-Mathematics -> complementary at arriving at the truth

METHOD OF DOUBT: SKEPTICISM

  • Doubt

    • unsure about life

    • Uncertainty

    • Descartes reworked concept of skepticism

  • Sophists - early skeptics

Descartes [“Skepticism”]

  • attitude that questions the reliability of the knowledge

Methodological Skepticism

  • methodical

  • Doubt as prerequisite at arriving at the truth

  • Doubting is the beginning of wisdom

  1. Senses/Sense Perception - deceiving; can be misleading “Plato’s Allegory of the Cave”; Father->God — chauvinistic society

  2. Material Bodies -> physical things; based on sense perception

  3. Natural Sciences - scientific disciplines study of nature/world; Chemistry, Physics; based upon sense perception

    • related/unified with each other

Objective - Descartes wants to doubt personal sentiments

  1. Tries to falsify Mathematics [true and certain for Descartes]

    • truths of human reasons -> should be falsified

      • Appears to be true

    • Should not be based on finite minds

    • Hypothetical malevolent Demon Argument -> constantly deceiving us

      • Falsify existence of God [all powerful and can deceive us]

      • Substitutes God as Demon (nullify truths) HYPOTHETICAL = uncertainty

“Even if I am deceived in all my beliefs, I must exist in order to be deceived.”

I think, therefore, I am/Cogito ergo sum

  • act of doubting/thinking confirms self to be real

DESCARTES’ MAIN OBJECTIVE IN HIS EPISTEMOLOGY (THE MEDITATIONS)

“Total Demolition and Reconstruction of Human Knowledge”

  1. Traditional knowledge is inadequate. It should be falsified.

    • destroy knowledge inadequate of the past

  2. Once falsified, knowledge must be reconstructed according to principles known by “Reason”.

    • recreate knowledge based on REASON-> best way to arrive at certain knowledge in life

  3. Descartes was a “system builder of knowledge”

*abandon old knowledge and reconstruct based on a better foundations (Reason) *Thinking = affirming and negating Doubting=thinking

COGITO ERGO SUM

  • Latin

  • Act of thinking = I/self = mind/mental entity

  • Cannot be body = sense perception

  • Foundational principle

  • What truly exists is the mind/self

  • Existence of self/real

*Clear and distinct - the more you doubt, the more you affirm it

*Independent - universally true in all human minds

*Existence - must pertain to the existence of self/mind

“I” (mind/cogito) - thinking, ideas, free will, (choice/decision), soul (spiritual soul that can exist independently in the body)

REVERSAL OF DOUBT

  • replace doubt with certainty

  • Prove other truths->mind and body

  • Must investigate features of the mind

  • Rebuild and reprove everything from the standpoint of Cogito

*Self - abstract/can exist out of body

SUBJECTIVISM (P.99)

  • I can only know with certainty = my own mind and my thoughts [mind + ideas about reality]

  • Viewpoint — truth=> mind and our thinking

  • Everything outside the mind is uncertain

2 MAJOR IMPLICATIONS OF SUBJECTIVISM

  1. Knowledge of things outside the mind — mind and/or self -> basis for reconstruction

  2. If mind is certain, outside the mind is uncertain; mind is detached from social world/human beings/physical nature

    • find not your own person - own standpoint

    • Break away from social norms

Solipsism

  • only the self exists and the ideas -> tries to prove material bodies

  • Enclosed standpoint

  • To overcome, other things exist along with the existence of the mind

  • My mind with its thoughts it the only thing that exists, the only reality

Test of Truth

  • self-evidently clear and distinct in the mind for it to be true

  • “Mathematics” X God

  • Prove there is a God to prove Mathematics->material world

  • Mathematics - universally true

  • Reconstruct God based on reason and logic

THEORY OF IDEAS:

  • idea: a concept which we are conscious of; definition of things

  • 3 types of ideas:

  • Innate

    • Naturally born with

      • Mathematics, logic, God (perfect Supreme being)

    • Self-evident to human reason

    • Descartes agrees, from human reason and clear and distinct

  • Factitious/Fictitious

    • Human imagination

      • Futuristic world

  • Adventitious

    • Caused by sense experience/outside human mind ->sense perception

      • Buildings, trees

*factitious and adventitious = illusion and sense perception

  • Ideas have 2 kinds of realities [function/objectives]

    • Actual/Formal Reality

      • Presence of ideas in the mind/the definition of an object

      • Ideas not found outside the mind; all definitions are in the mind but not all are clear and distinct

    • Objective Reality

      • Ideas refer to objects

      • Functions of ideas in reference to outside of mind

      • Correspondence of ideas to external objects

      • Natural function of ideas (hierarchical)

*”7”- what makes 7 a 7 — actual reality [concept]

  • idea + objects — objective reality

*For something to exist outside the mind, it should be clear and distinct

THEORY OF CAUSES (p.103)

“All ideas are the effects of causes => all thing do not happen out of the blue

3 Self Evident Propositions about Causes

  1. There must be as much reality in the cause as in the effect

  2. Something cannot come from nothing

    • must come from certain explanation/thing which is real

  3. What is perfect cannot proceed from the imperfect

    • concept of perfection must come from something perfect

Cause and Effect

  • nature of cause should be the same as the nature of effect

  • Not merely a connection

DESCARTES RATIONALISTIC PROOFS FOR GOD

  1. First Proof (p. 105) “Doctrine of Ideas”

    • God is the cause and we are the effect

    • CRITICISMS:

      • Ludwig Feuerbach

        • “God is a projection of the human mind”

        • Create “perfect being”/ false illusion to escape imperfections of the world

        • Perfection is manmade

      • Postmodernism

        • Criticizes modern structures/idea of humanity

        • Concept of perfection => social construct

        • Perfection makes us stagnant, limited in our lives

      • Assumes that the “innate idea of God is universal” but it is relative

  2. Second Proof (p. 106)

    • I cannot be the cause of my own existence

    • Infinite regress - other selves cannot be the cause of our existence [no starting point]

    • God - first uncaused cause which makes Cogito exist [1st uncaused cause = matter/energy]

    • Process of elimination

  3. Third Proof (p. 107)

    • ontological argument

    • Developed by Saint Anselm

    • Definition/idea of God as a perfect being -> prove existence -> investigate God as a perfect being

    • Political reasons in personal life (Galileo excommunicated)

      • Appease the church

      • Extra proof to be politically correct

    • If God is complete and perfect, then He must exist Proves God through the definition of God

    • God exists because He is conceptualized as a perfect being

    • To be perfect is to be complete

    • A perfect being must have the attribute of existence

AFTERMATH OF PROVING GOD

  1. God is the ultimate cause of the “self”

    • the reason we exist is because of an ultimate creator

  2. On “human error” — misuse of “free will”

    • human mistakes is not based on God

    • Free will -> arbitrary, can mislead you from the truth

  3. God as the basis for the ideas of Math and logical reasoning

DESCARTES’ PROOF FOR MATERIAL BODIES/PHYSICAL SUBSTANCES (pp.112-113)

“Can the mind be the cause of the idea of a material body?”

Idea of material bodies X mind; X free will

*God cannot be the cause of physical things - God-> all good nature-> idea must come from actual material bodies

“Clear and Distinct” and “Objective”

  • objective: exists independently from the human senses

Primary Qualities

  1. Size and shapes/figures

  2. Capacity for motion/change [motion based on human reason]

  3. Volume and space/spatial extension

*thorough understanding of math/geometry, you will have a thorough understanding of the world.

DESCARTES’ VIEW OF THE UNIVERSE

  • Theory on Mechanism (pp. 117-118) -> scientific view of the universe

Clockwork Universe

  • infinite extension

  • Constant motion

  • Physical World: works like a clock, determined

  • Animals: matter in motion; operate on instinct than free will

*Conscience, human reason, and free will sets humans apart from animals

S

Philosophy: Epistemology

Epistemology

  • study on knowledge; ideals with the nature of human world/consciousness -> gain knowledge about the truth

  • 3 Questions

    • What is knowledge/wisdom/certainty? [facts, reality, opinions, and knowledge]

    • What is the nature of knowledge? [criteria, defining points of knowledge]

    • How can one know reality? [how a human mind logically gain/understand reality]

  • 3 Philosophical Systems of Epistemology: rationalism, empiricism, critical philosophy

Rationalism

  • human intelligence is universal in all human minds

    • Regardless of differences

    • Optimistic

  • Human reason is a defining element of a human person

  • Human reason is the only means to certainty in knowledge

    • Human reason is not unruly

    • Logical way of thinking

  • Reason is the only way to determine what is morally right and good and what constitutes a good society

    • Reason is the gateway to reality

    • Makes us distinguish good from bad — can promote just and orderly society

Rene Descartes

  • supports reason as the only viable reason for the truth about life

  • Paris, France (1596-1650)

  • Elite society Father of Modern Philosophy

Modern Philosophy

  • based on the spectrum of science

  • Empowers the existence of men; prove God through human reason

  • Europe (17th-19th century) -> origin [France and Germany]

  • Epistemology and Metaphysics -> center

  • Direct reason to the “Medieval Period” (theocentric)

    • Medieval Period: man is finite-> cannot gain access to the truth; everyone glorified God as absolute truth; God-centered

  • Descartes wants to restore faith in humanity (make humans progress)

  • Rise of science -> step by step discipline

  • Galileo exterminated from Christian society: “Can the physical world be understood mathematically without reference to God?”

Rene Descartes (cont’d)

  • studied at “La Fleche” University (Jesuit order)

  • One of the founders of Analytic Geometry

  • Mathematics (i.e. Geometry)

    • Intuition and Deduction

    • Clear and Distinct

Theology is wrong

  • based on faith which is blind

  • Glorifies fiction instead of facts

  • Serves as blockage/limitation to human reasoning

    • Prevents men about learning new things in life

Intuition

  • ability of the mind/human reason to arrive at something that is really true/certain

  • Mind cannot help but accept it as true

Deduction

  • the capacity of the mind that complements intuition

  • To arrange certain truths in a logical sequence/hierarchy/ chronological

    • Comprehensive wisdom about life

    • 1–2–3

  • Mathematics is clear and distinct->test for the truth

    • Which is inevitably true

DESCARTES’ EPISTEMOLOGY: The Meditation

  • Main Objective: Total demolition and Reconstruction of human knowledge

FOUNDATIONAL PRINCIPLE: starting point/basis for certainty

  • clear and distinct -> free of error

  • Independent

    • Autonomous; not dependent on anything; free from other truths to be certain

      • The principle is a certain thing whose existence does not (...)

  • Existence

    • About something which is real/reality

Epistemology

  • rework knowledge of the past [inadequate]

  • Restructure based on own foundations and principles

  • System-builders

  • Mind-based

Best Philosophy - rigidly structured/uniformed at arriving at the truth

  • Philosophy-Mathematics -> complementary at arriving at the truth

METHOD OF DOUBT: SKEPTICISM

  • Doubt

    • unsure about life

    • Uncertainty

    • Descartes reworked concept of skepticism

  • Sophists - early skeptics

Descartes [“Skepticism”]

  • attitude that questions the reliability of the knowledge

Methodological Skepticism

  • methodical

  • Doubt as prerequisite at arriving at the truth

  • Doubting is the beginning of wisdom

  1. Senses/Sense Perception - deceiving; can be misleading “Plato’s Allegory of the Cave”; Father->God — chauvinistic society

  2. Material Bodies -> physical things; based on sense perception

  3. Natural Sciences - scientific disciplines study of nature/world; Chemistry, Physics; based upon sense perception

    • related/unified with each other

Objective - Descartes wants to doubt personal sentiments

  1. Tries to falsify Mathematics [true and certain for Descartes]

    • truths of human reasons -> should be falsified

      • Appears to be true

    • Should not be based on finite minds

    • Hypothetical malevolent Demon Argument -> constantly deceiving us

      • Falsify existence of God [all powerful and can deceive us]

      • Substitutes God as Demon (nullify truths) HYPOTHETICAL = uncertainty

“Even if I am deceived in all my beliefs, I must exist in order to be deceived.”

I think, therefore, I am/Cogito ergo sum

  • act of doubting/thinking confirms self to be real

DESCARTES’ MAIN OBJECTIVE IN HIS EPISTEMOLOGY (THE MEDITATIONS)

“Total Demolition and Reconstruction of Human Knowledge”

  1. Traditional knowledge is inadequate. It should be falsified.

    • destroy knowledge inadequate of the past

  2. Once falsified, knowledge must be reconstructed according to principles known by “Reason”.

    • recreate knowledge based on REASON-> best way to arrive at certain knowledge in life

  3. Descartes was a “system builder of knowledge”

*abandon old knowledge and reconstruct based on a better foundations (Reason) *Thinking = affirming and negating Doubting=thinking

COGITO ERGO SUM

  • Latin

  • Act of thinking = I/self = mind/mental entity

  • Cannot be body = sense perception

  • Foundational principle

  • What truly exists is the mind/self

  • Existence of self/real

*Clear and distinct - the more you doubt, the more you affirm it

*Independent - universally true in all human minds

*Existence - must pertain to the existence of self/mind

“I” (mind/cogito) - thinking, ideas, free will, (choice/decision), soul (spiritual soul that can exist independently in the body)

REVERSAL OF DOUBT

  • replace doubt with certainty

  • Prove other truths->mind and body

  • Must investigate features of the mind

  • Rebuild and reprove everything from the standpoint of Cogito

*Self - abstract/can exist out of body

SUBJECTIVISM (P.99)

  • I can only know with certainty = my own mind and my thoughts [mind + ideas about reality]

  • Viewpoint — truth=> mind and our thinking

  • Everything outside the mind is uncertain

2 MAJOR IMPLICATIONS OF SUBJECTIVISM

  1. Knowledge of things outside the mind — mind and/or self -> basis for reconstruction

  2. If mind is certain, outside the mind is uncertain; mind is detached from social world/human beings/physical nature

    • find not your own person - own standpoint

    • Break away from social norms

Solipsism

  • only the self exists and the ideas -> tries to prove material bodies

  • Enclosed standpoint

  • To overcome, other things exist along with the existence of the mind

  • My mind with its thoughts it the only thing that exists, the only reality

Test of Truth

  • self-evidently clear and distinct in the mind for it to be true

  • “Mathematics” X God

  • Prove there is a God to prove Mathematics->material world

  • Mathematics - universally true

  • Reconstruct God based on reason and logic

THEORY OF IDEAS:

  • idea: a concept which we are conscious of; definition of things

  • 3 types of ideas:

  • Innate

    • Naturally born with

      • Mathematics, logic, God (perfect Supreme being)

    • Self-evident to human reason

    • Descartes agrees, from human reason and clear and distinct

  • Factitious/Fictitious

    • Human imagination

      • Futuristic world

  • Adventitious

    • Caused by sense experience/outside human mind ->sense perception

      • Buildings, trees

*factitious and adventitious = illusion and sense perception

  • Ideas have 2 kinds of realities [function/objectives]

    • Actual/Formal Reality

      • Presence of ideas in the mind/the definition of an object

      • Ideas not found outside the mind; all definitions are in the mind but not all are clear and distinct

    • Objective Reality

      • Ideas refer to objects

      • Functions of ideas in reference to outside of mind

      • Correspondence of ideas to external objects

      • Natural function of ideas (hierarchical)

*”7”- what makes 7 a 7 — actual reality [concept]

  • idea + objects — objective reality

*For something to exist outside the mind, it should be clear and distinct

THEORY OF CAUSES (p.103)

“All ideas are the effects of causes => all thing do not happen out of the blue

3 Self Evident Propositions about Causes

  1. There must be as much reality in the cause as in the effect

  2. Something cannot come from nothing

    • must come from certain explanation/thing which is real

  3. What is perfect cannot proceed from the imperfect

    • concept of perfection must come from something perfect

Cause and Effect

  • nature of cause should be the same as the nature of effect

  • Not merely a connection

DESCARTES RATIONALISTIC PROOFS FOR GOD

  1. First Proof (p. 105) “Doctrine of Ideas”

    • God is the cause and we are the effect

    • CRITICISMS:

      • Ludwig Feuerbach

        • “God is a projection of the human mind”

        • Create “perfect being”/ false illusion to escape imperfections of the world

        • Perfection is manmade

      • Postmodernism

        • Criticizes modern structures/idea of humanity

        • Concept of perfection => social construct

        • Perfection makes us stagnant, limited in our lives

      • Assumes that the “innate idea of God is universal” but it is relative

  2. Second Proof (p. 106)

    • I cannot be the cause of my own existence

    • Infinite regress - other selves cannot be the cause of our existence [no starting point]

    • God - first uncaused cause which makes Cogito exist [1st uncaused cause = matter/energy]

    • Process of elimination

  3. Third Proof (p. 107)

    • ontological argument

    • Developed by Saint Anselm

    • Definition/idea of God as a perfect being -> prove existence -> investigate God as a perfect being

    • Political reasons in personal life (Galileo excommunicated)

      • Appease the church

      • Extra proof to be politically correct

    • If God is complete and perfect, then He must exist Proves God through the definition of God

    • God exists because He is conceptualized as a perfect being

    • To be perfect is to be complete

    • A perfect being must have the attribute of existence

AFTERMATH OF PROVING GOD

  1. God is the ultimate cause of the “self”

    • the reason we exist is because of an ultimate creator

  2. On “human error” — misuse of “free will”

    • human mistakes is not based on God

    • Free will -> arbitrary, can mislead you from the truth

  3. God as the basis for the ideas of Math and logical reasoning

DESCARTES’ PROOF FOR MATERIAL BODIES/PHYSICAL SUBSTANCES (pp.112-113)

“Can the mind be the cause of the idea of a material body?”

Idea of material bodies X mind; X free will

*God cannot be the cause of physical things - God-> all good nature-> idea must come from actual material bodies

“Clear and Distinct” and “Objective”

  • objective: exists independently from the human senses

Primary Qualities

  1. Size and shapes/figures

  2. Capacity for motion/change [motion based on human reason]

  3. Volume and space/spatial extension

*thorough understanding of math/geometry, you will have a thorough understanding of the world.

DESCARTES’ VIEW OF THE UNIVERSE

  • Theory on Mechanism (pp. 117-118) -> scientific view of the universe

Clockwork Universe

  • infinite extension

  • Constant motion

  • Physical World: works like a clock, determined

  • Animals: matter in motion; operate on instinct than free will

*Conscience, human reason, and free will sets humans apart from animals