ICJ case study: Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Croatia v. Serbia)

studied byStudied by 12 people
0.0(0)
get a hint
hint

July 2 1999

1 / 7

8 Terms

1

July 2 1999

When did Croatia filed a report to ICJ about the violation of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide?

New cards
2

The Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, but Serbia took the case in 2010 after the country's transformation.

Who was the main “antagonistic “ party in the hearing, and how did it change over time?

New cards
3

The case was closed in January 2015 after over 23 years of debate. The delay was mostly due to Serbia's claims that It rejected the historical responsibility for Yugoslavia’s political decisions.

When was the case closed, and what are the political reasons behind its length?

New cards
4

They field an opposite claim that Croatia has committed crimes of Genocide against its population.

What was Serbia’s initial response to the inheriting the case?

New cards
5
  1. Direct violence in the form of mental or physical abuse against a population of a specific ethnicity is widespread and proven by public hearings.

  2. Dolus specialist- a specific intent to eradicate a population of a certain ethnicity that has to be proven by the state policy or can be inferred from a state pattern of conduct.

What are the two elements of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide that has to be proved for the ICJ to claim that genocide has been committed?

New cards
6

Genocide has not been committed against both Serbians and Croatians.

Genocide has not been committed against both Serbians and Croatians. What was the final ICJ decision over both genocide accusations?

New cards
7

Direct violence against the Croatian population has been proven, but its cause was determined not to be eradication but rather displacement.

Direct violence against the Croatian population has been proven, but its cause was determined not to be eradication but rather displacement. What was the reason behind this political decision in the case of Croatia?

New cards
8

Direct violence against the Croatian population has been proven, but its cause was determined not to be eradication but rather a defense of an individual and sovereignty.

What was the reason behind this political decision in the case of Serbia?

New cards

Explore top notes

note Note
studied byStudied by 13 people
Updated ... ago
5.0 Stars(1)
note Note
studied byStudied by 8 people
Updated ... ago
5.0 Stars(1)
note Note
studied byStudied by 5 people
Updated ... ago
5.0 Stars(1)
note Note
studied byStudied by 17 people
Updated ... ago
4.5 Stars(2)
note Note
studied byStudied by 6 people
Updated ... ago
5.0 Stars(1)
note Note
studied byStudied by 11 people
Updated ... ago
5.0 Stars(2)
note Note
studied byStudied by 4 people
Updated ... ago
5.0 Stars(1)
note Note
studied byStudied by 18 people
Updated ... ago
4.5 Stars(2)

Explore top flashcards

flashcards Flashcard187 terms
studied byStudied by 24 people
Updated ... ago
4.0 Stars(1)
flashcards Flashcard59 terms
studied byStudied by 16 people
Updated ... ago
5.0 Stars(1)
flashcards Flashcard65 terms
studied byStudied by 22 people
Updated ... ago
5.0 Stars(1)
flashcards Flashcard53 terms
studied byStudied by 26 people
Updated ... ago
5.0 Stars(1)
flashcards Flashcard105 terms
studied byStudied by 13 people
Updated ... ago
5.0 Stars(1)
flashcards Flashcard53 terms
studied byStudied by 39 people
Updated ... ago
5.0 Stars(1)
flashcards Flashcard103 terms
studied byStudied by 31 people
Updated ... ago
5.0 Stars(1)
flashcards Flashcard44 terms
studied byStudied by 45 people
Updated ... ago
5.0 Stars(1)