Creates uncertainty
‘Stare decisis’ means the same decision will be made by lower courts and higher courts don’t want to overrule precedent.
Jones v SoSSS - refused to overrule Re Dowling.
Lawyers, judges and defendants can effectively prepare for cases.
COUNTER - lead to rigidity.
Rigid
Decisions don’t change as judges make the same decisions as higher courts.
Jones v SoSSS - decision in Re Dowling was wrong but kept it anyway for certainty.
Bad and outdated law will not be changed quickly enough.
COUNTER - creates certainty.
Flexible
Ways of avoiding precedent, as higher courts can overrule and any court can distinguish.
R v Shivpuri - overruled Anderton v Ryan as there was serious error.
Bad decisions are avoided and the law stays updated.
COUNTER - created uncertainty.
Uncertainty
Avoiding precedent made it hard to make decisions in the future.
Merritt v Merritt - distinguished Balfour v Balfour on marital agreements.
Hard to predict the outcome, having a negative effect on lawyers, judges and defendants.
COUNTER - help avoid injustices.
Respond to real life situations
Precedent is based on case law and real life situations.
R v R - marital rape made a crime.
Law can be made and changed in response to real events and updated with society.
COUNTER - complex.
Complex
½ million precedents and more are getting created through distinguishing.
Re J - could not figure out what the ratio was.
Defeats the point of precedent.
COUNTER - respond quickly to real life situations.
Judicial creativity
Existing law doesn’t apply the current facts it can be distinguished and original precedent allows judges to create a law where there is no previous law.
R v R - Parliament had no guidance about marital rape, so judges made it illegal.
Leads to justice and saves Parliament’s time.
COUNTER - goes against the separation of powers.
Goes against separation of powers
Allows judges to make and change laws when only Parliament should have this power.
R v R - judges chose to make marital rape illegal.
Judges are not democratically elected and may not reflect Parliament/society’s wishes.
COUNTER - save Parliament’s time.